4.3 Article

Different pressure-temperature behavior of the structured and unstructured regions of titin

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2012.10.001

关键词

Titin; I27; PEVK; High pressure; Phase diagram

资金

  1. Hungarian Science Foundation [OTKA K77730, K73256]
  2. Hungarian National Development Agency [TAMOP-4.2.1.B-09/1/1KMR-2010-0001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Contrary to the classical view, according to which all proteins adopt a specific folded conformation necessary for their function, intrinsically unstructured proteins (IUPs) display random-coil-like conformation under physiological conditions. We compared the structured and unstructured domains from titin, a giant protein responsible for striated-muscle elasticity. A 171-residue-long fragment (polyE) of the disordered PEVK domain, and an Ig domain (127) with ordered structure were investigated. FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) and fluorescence spectroscopy combined with a diamond anvil cell were used for investigation of the secondary structures under wide range of pressure and temperature. PolyE preserves its disordered characteristics across the entire range of investigated pressure (0-16 kbar), temperature (0-100 degrees C), pD (3-10.5) and different solvent conditions. The detailed temperature-pressure phase diagram of titin 127 was determined. At 30 degrees C, increasing pressure unfolds titin 127 in one step at 10.5 kbar. Increasing temperature at atmospheric pressure results in two transitions. At 50 degrees C the secondary structure is loosened and the protein transforms into a molten-globule state. At 65 degrees C the protein completely unfolds. Unfolding is followed by aggregation at ambient pressure. Moderate pressures (>2 kbar), however, can prevent the protein from aggregation. Our experiments in wide range of physical parameters revealed four different structures for 127, while the unstructured character of the PEVK fragment is insensitive to these parameters. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据