4.5 Review

Biochemical and structural insights into intramembrane metalloprotease mechanisms

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1828, 期 12, 页码 2873-2885

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.03.032

关键词

Intramembrane metalloprotease; S2P; SpoIVFB; RseP; PDZ domain; CBS domain

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [GM43585]
  2. Michigan State University AgBioResearch
  3. Institute for Fermentation, Osaka
  4. JSPS KAKENHI [24370054]
  5. MEXT KAKENHI [19058007]
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19058007] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intramembrane metalloproteases are nearly ubiquitous in living organisms and they function in diverse processes ranging from cholesterol homeostasis and the unfolded protein response in humans to sporulation, stress responses, and virulence of bacteria. Understanding how these enzymes function in membranes is a challenge of fundamental interest with potential applications if modulators can be devised. Progress is described toward a mechanistic understanding, based primarily on molecular genetic and biochemical studies of human S2P and bacterial SpoIVFB and RseP, and on the structure of the membrane domain of an archaeal enzyme. Conserved features of the enzymes appear to include transmembrane helices and loops around the active site zinc ion, which may be near the membrane surface. Extramembrane domains such as PDZ (PSD-95, DLG, ZO-1) or CBS (cystathionine-beta-synthase) domains govern substrate access to the active site, but several different mechanisms of access and cleavage site selection can be envisioned, which might differ depending on the substrate and the enzyme. More work is needed to distinguish between these mechanisms, both for enzymes that have been relatively well-studied, and for enzymes lacking PDZ and CBS domains, which have not been studied. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Intramembrane Proteases. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据