4.5 Article

Culture of hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors in alginate-based scaffolds

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 103, 期 12, 页码 3717-3726

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35507

关键词

alginate; extracellular matrix; -cells; stem cells; encapsulation

资金

  1. NTNU [221576]
  2. Liaison Committee
  3. Norwegian Research Council, the Marpol project [221576]
  4. MRC [G0800784, G1000847] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G1000847, G0800784] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of alginate-based scaffolds with added basement membrane proteins on the in vitro development of hESC-derived pancreatic progenitors was investigated. Cell clusters were encapsulated in scaffolds containing the basement membrane proteins collagen IV, laminin, fibronectin, or extracellular matrix-derived peptides, and maintained in culture for up to 46 days. The cells remained viable throughout the experiment with no signs of central necrosis. Whereas nonencapsulated cells aggregated into larger clusters, some of which showed signs of morphological changes and tissue organization, the alginate matrix stabilized the cluster size and displayed more homogeneous cell morphologies, allowing culture for long periods of time. For all conditions tested, a stable or declining expression of insulin and PDX1 and an increase in glucagon and somatostatin over time indicated a progressive reduction in beta cell-related gene expression. Alginate scaffolds can provide a chemically defined, xeno-free and easily scalable alternative for culture of pancreatic progenitors. Although no increase in insulin and PDX1 gene expression after alginate-immobilized cell culture was seen in this study, further optimization of the matrix physicochemical and biological properties and of the medium composition may still be a relevant strategy to promote the stabilization or maturation of stem cell-derived beta cells. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 103A: 3717-3726, 2015.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据