4.4 Article

Two-Parameter Kinetic Model Based on a Time-Dependent Activity Coefficient Accurately Describes Enzymatic Cellulose Digestion

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 33, 页码 5656-5664

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi400358v

关键词

-

资金

  1. BioEnergy Science Center
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) center
  3. Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the DOE Office of Science

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lignocellulosic biomass is a potential source of renewable, low-carbon-footprint liquid fuels. Biomass recalcitrance and enzyme cost are key challenges associated with the large-scale production of cellulosic fuel. Kinetic modeling of enzymatic cellulose digestion has been complicated by the heterogeneous nature of the substrate and by the fact that a true steady state cannot be attained. We present a two-parameter kinetic model based on the Michaelis-Menten scheme (Michaelis, L., and Menten, M. L. (1913) Biochem. Z., 49, 333-369) with a time-dependent activity coefficient analogous to fractal-like kinetics formulated by Kopelman (Kopelman, R. (1988) Science 241, 1620-1626). We provide a mathematical derivation and experimental support to show that one of the parameters is a total activity coefficient and the other is an intrinsic constant that reflects the ability of the cellulases to overcome substrate recalcitrance. The model is applicable to individual cellulases and their mixtures at low-to-medium enzyme loads. Using biomass degrading enzymes from cellulolytic bacterium Thermobifida fusca, we show that the model can be used for mechanistic studies of enzymatic cellulose digestion. We also demonstrate that it applies to the crude supernatant of the widely studied cellulolytic fungus Trichoderma reesei; thus it can be used to compare cellulases from different organisms. The two parameters may serve a similar role to V-max, K-M, and k(cat) in classical kinetics. A similar approach may be applicable to other enzymes with heterogeneous substrates and where a steady state is not achievable.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据