4.4 Article

A Comparative Study on Conformation and Ligand Binding of the Neuronal Uncoupling Proteinst

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 3, 页码 512-521

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi901742g

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mitochondrial uncoupling proteins of the nervous system (UCPs 2, 4, and 5) have potential roles in the function and protection of the central nervous system (CNS). In the absence Of Structural information, conformations of the hexahistidine-tagged versions of all five human UCPs in liposomes were investigated for the first time, using far- and near-UV CD and fluorescence spectroscopy. Highly pure UCPs 1-5 were reconstituted in detergents and stable small unilamellar vesicles, appropriate for spectroscopic studies. All UCPs formed dominantly helical conformations in negatively charged phospholipid vesicles (palmitoyloleopylphosphatidylcholine/palmitoyloleoylphosphatidylglycerol 7:3 molar ratio). UCPs 2 and 5 exhibited comparable helical conformations with possible association in lipid bilayers, Whereas UCP4 had a different helical profile that can be related to its less associated form. Interaction of reconstituted UCPs with GDP and GTP, inhibitors of the prototypic UCP1, was detected by near-UV CD and fluorescence spectroscopy, utilizing the sensitivity of these technique to microenvironments around Trp residues close to the nucleotide binding site. Binding of UCP4 to purine nucleotides was also different from other UCPs. Binding of fatty acids, activators of proton transport in UCPS, to UCPs could not be unambiguously detected, wmplying a nonbinding conformation/orientation of the proteoliposornes. Interaction of CoA with UCPs Was comparable to nucleotide binding, Suggesting a possible binding of this molecule at the nucleotide binding site. Despite dissimilar primary sequences, neuronal UCPs share common structural and functional properties with UCPs I and 3, Supporting a common physiological role in addition to their specific roles In tile CNS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据