4.4 Article

Structural insights into specificity and diversity in mechanisms of ubiquitin recognition by ubiquitin-binding domains

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 40, 期 -, 页码 404-408

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST20110729

关键词

atrogene; NMR spectroscopy; p62; Paget's disease of bone (PDB); sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1); ubiquitin-associated domain (UBA domain)

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. Arthritis Research Campaign
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I011420/1, BB/F013663/1, BB/C503754/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/F013663/1, BB/I011420/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

UBDs [Ub (ubiquitin)-binding domains], which are typically small protein motifs of <50 residues, are used by receptor proteins to transduce post-translational Ub modifications in a wide range of biological processes, including NF-kappa B (nuclear factor kappa B) signalling and proteasomal degradation pathways. More than 20 families of UBDs have now been characterized in structural detail and, although many recognize the canonical Ile(44)/Val(70)-binding patch on Ub, a smaller number have alternative Ub-recognition sites. The A20 Znf (A20-like zinc finger) of the ZNF216 protein is one of the latter and binds with high affinity to a polar site on Ub centred around Asp(58)/Gln(62). ZNF216 shares some biological function with p62, with both linked to NF-kappa B signal activation and as shuttle proteins in proteasomal degradation pathways. The UBA domain (Ub-associated domain) of p62, although binding to Ub through the Ile(44)/Val(70) patch, is unique in forming a stable dimer that negatively regulates Ub recognition. We show that the A20 Znf and UBA domain are able to form a ternary complex through independent interactions with a single Ub molecule, supporting functional models for Ub as a 'hub' for mediating multi-protein complex assembly and for enhancing signalling specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据