4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

The interaction of IQGAPs with calmodulin-like proteins

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 694-699

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST0390694

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D000394/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/D000394/1] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline
  4. BBSRC [BB/D000394/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since their identification over 15 years ago, the IQGAP (IQ-motif-containing GTPase-activating protein) family of proteins have been implicated in a wide range of cellular processes, including cytoskeletal reorganization, cell-cell adhesion, cytokinesis and apoptosis. These processes rely on protein-protein interactions, and understanding these (and how they influence one another) is critical in determining how the IQGAPs function. A key group of interactions is with calmodulin and the structurally related proteins myosin essential light chain and S100B. These interactions occur primarily through a series of IQ motifs, which are alpha-helical segments of the protein located towards the middle of the primary sequence. The three human IQGAP isoforms (IQGAP1, IQGAP2 and IQGAP3) all have four IQ motifs. However, these have different affinities for calmodulin, myosin light chain and S100B. Whereas all four IQ motifs of IQGAP1 interact with calmodulin in the presence of calcium, only the last two do so in the absence of calcium. IQ1 (the first IQ motif) interacts with the myosin essential light chain MIc1sa and the first two undergo a calcium-dependent interaction with S100B. The significance of the interaction between MIc1sa and IQGAP1 in mammals is unknown. However, a similar interaction involving the Saccharomyces cerevisiae IQGAP-like protein Iqg1p is involved in cytokinesis, leading to speculation that there may be a similar role in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据