4.7 Article

The intestinal antiinflammatory agent glycomacropeptide has immunomodulatory actions on rat splenocytes

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 79, 期 12, 页码 1797-1804

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2010.02.008

关键词

Glycomacropeptide; STAT4; Inflammatory bowel disease; Th1; Treg; Foxp3

资金

  1. Institut de Salud Carlos III

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bovine glycomacropeptide (GMP) is an immunologically active milk peptide that is a part of the normal human diet. GMP has therapeutic value in preclinical models of intestinal inflammation, and its mechanism may be related to effects on lymphocytes. This study focuses on the actions of GNP on rat splenocytes in vitro and in vivo. Bovine serum albumin and lactoferrin were used for comparative purposes. GMP (0.01-0.1 mg mL(-1)) enhanced Concanavalin A (ConA) evoked but not basal splenocyte proliferation. At 1 mg mL(-1) GMP lost this effect but augmented basal TNF-alpha secretion and also iNOS and COX2 expression. IFN-gamma, IL-2 and IL-17 were not affected by GMP in quiescent splenocytes, but IL-10 was augmented at all concentrations tested. On the other hand, GMP produced a marked inhibitory effect (70%) on IFN-gamma secretion and to a lower extent (50%) also on TNF-alpha. GMP was shown to block STAT4 but not I kappa B-alpha phosphorylation. The Treg marker Foxp3 was markedly upregulated by GMP. Bovine serum albumin had some effects on splenocyte function which were of lower magnitude and not entirely coincidental, while lactoferrin had a strong antiproliferative effect, as expected, indicating a specific effect of GMP. When administered for 3 days to normal Wistar rats, GMP reproduced the Foxp3 induction effect observed previously in vitro. This was observed in splenocytes but not in thymocytes, and only when administered by the oral rather than the intraperitoneal route. Thus our results support the hypothesis that GMP may limit intestinal inflammation acting at least in part on lymphocytes. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据