4.7 Article

Activation of distinct P2Y receptor subtypes stimulates insulin secretion in MIN6 mouse pancreatic β cells

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 79, 期 9, 页码 1317-1326

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2009.12.026

关键词

Nucleotides; G protein-coupled receptors; Phospholipase C; Radioligand binding

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program of NIDDK
  2. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular nucleotides and their receptor antagonists have therapeutic potential in disorders such as inflammation, brain disorders, and cardiovascular diseases. Pancreatic beta cells express several purinergic receptors, and reported nucleotide effects on insulin secretion are contradictory. We studied the effect of P2Y receptors on insulin secretion and cell death in MIN6, mouse pancreatic beta cells. Expression of P2Y(1) and P2Y(6) receptors was revealed by total mRNA analysis using RT-PCR. MIN6 cells were stimulated in the presence of 16.7 mM glucose with or without P2Y(1) and P2Y(6) agonists, 2-MeSADP and UPA respectively. Both the agonists increased insulin secretion with EC50 values of 44.6 +/- 7.0 nM and 30.7 +/- 12.7 nM respectively. The insulin secretion by P2Y(1) and P2Y(6) agonists was blocked by their selective antagonists MRS2179 and MRS2578, respectively. Binding of the selective P2Y(1) receptor antagonist radioligand [I-125]MRS2500 in MIN6 cell membranes was saturable (K-D 4.74 +/- 0.47 nM), and known P2Y, ligands competed with high affinities. Inflammation and glucose toxicity lead to pancreatic beta cell death in diabetes. Flow cytometric analysis revealed that Up(3)U but not 2-MeSADP protected MIN6 cells against TNF-alpha induced apoptosis. Overall, the results demonstrate that selective stimulation of P2Y(1) and P2Y(6) receptors increases insulin secretion that accompanies intracellular calcium release, suggesting potential application of P2Y receptor ligands in the treatment of diabetes. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据