4.5 Article

Ligand binding and complex formation of galectin-3 is modulated by pH variations

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 457, 期 -, 页码 107-115

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20130933

关键词

fluorescence polarization; galectin; giant plasma membrane vesicle; glycan; oligomerization

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [JA 1033, Graduiertenkolleg 1216, Sonderforschungsbereich 593]
  2. Swedish Research Council [621-2009-5656]
  3. European Community [HEALTH-F2-2011-256986]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Galectin-3-dependent clusters or lattices are formed at the surface as well as in distinct organelles of eukaryotic cells. Incorporation into membrane proximal networks can fix glycoproteins within subcellular domains or sort them into distinct transport pathways. In the present paper we analysed the effect of acidification on the sugar binding and self-oligomerization of galectin-3. Using a fluorescence anisotropy assay we measured decreasing galectin-3 affinities to the blood group antigen GaINAc alpha 1-3(Fuc alpha 1-2)Gal beta 1-4G1c under low pH conditions. Binding to the strong interaction partner N-acetyl-D-lactosamine was also lost at pH 5.0, whereas the less efficient ligand lactose was still able to bind. This indicates that variations in the binding specificity to distinct glycans can be observed by altering the pH. The formation of galectin-3-based complexes by interaction with the multivalent glycoproteins asialofetuin or transferrin was also obliterated at acidic pH and the ligand-binding affinity itself was modulated by oligomerization of the lectin. When galectin-3 was added to giant plasma membrane vesicles from the apical surface of epithelial cells, pH modulation could generate or eliminate the formation of membrane domains enriched with p75(NTR) (neurotrophin receptor p75). In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that the formation and composition of galectin-3 networks can be fine-tuned by changes in the environmental pH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据