4.5 Article

An analysis of splicing, actin-binding properties, heterodimerization and molecular interactions of the non-muscle α-actinins

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 452, 期 -, 页码 477-488

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20121824

关键词

actinin-1; actinin-4; actinin heterodimer; non-muscle actinin; spectrin repeats

资金

  1. Health Research Board, PhD Scholars Programme in Cancer Biology [PhD/2007/4]
  2. Health Research Board (HRB) [PHD-2007-4] Funding Source: Health Research Board (HRB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The non-muscle alpha-actinin isoforms (actinin-1 and -4) are closely related dimeric actin filament cross-linking proteins. Despite high sequence similarity, unique properties have been ascribed to actinin-4 in particular. For example, actinin-4, but not actinin-1, is essential for normal glomerular function in the kidney, is overexpressed in several cancers and can translocate to the nucleus to regulate transcription. To understand the molecular basis for such isoform-specific functions we have, for the first time, comprehensively compared these proteins in terms of alternative splicing, actin-binding properties, heterodimer formation and molecular interactions. We find that the Ca2+-insensitive variant of actinin-4 is expressed only in the nervous system and thus cannot be regarded as a smooth muscle isoform, as is the case for the Ca2+-insensitive variant of actinin-1. The actin-binding properties of actinin-1 and -4 are similar and are unlikely to explain isoform-specific functions. Surprisingly, we reveal that actinin-1/-4 heterodimers, rather than homodimers, are the most abundant form of actinin in many cell lines. Finally, we use a proteomics approach to identify potential isoform-specific interactions. The results of the present study indicate that actinin-1 and -4 can readily form heterodimers composed of monomers that may have different properties and interacting proteins. This significantly alters our view of non-muscle actinin function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据