4.5 Article

Heat-shock proteins attenuate SERCA inactivation by the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2: possible implications for the ER Ca2+ -mediated apoptosis

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 444, 期 -, 页码 127-139

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20111114

关键词

apoptosis; Bcl-2; calcium; endoplasmic reticulum; heat-shock protein; sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ -ATPase (SERCA)

资金

  1. American Heart Association [0355555Z]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P01AG12993]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have demonstrated previously that Bcl-2 and Bcl-2 Delta 21, a C-terminally truncated Bcl-2 sequence, inactivate SERCA (sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ -ATPase) 1 in isolated SR (sarcoplasmic reticulum), accompanied by a translocation from CRDs (caveolae-related domains) of the SR. In the present study, we obtained evidence for the interaction of Bcl-2 with SERCA2b in C2C12 myoblasts and HEK (human embryonic kidney)-293 cells. Bcl-2 and SERCA2b co-immunoprecipitated from lysate and microsomal fractions of Bcl-2-overexpressing cells. However, Bcl-2 overexpression resulted only in a slight translocation from the CRDs and no significant SERCA inactivation. In isolated HEK-293 cell microsomes, incubation with Bcl-2 Delta 21 afforded SERCA2b inactivation and some translocation. HSP (heat-shock protein) 70, HSP90, HSP27 and alpha-crystallin attenuated Bcl-2 Delta 21-dependent SERCA2b inactivation. An in vitro mechanistic study with the SERCA 1 isoform shows that HSP70 (i) protects SERCA1 from the inactivation by Bcl-2 Delta 21, (ii) inhibits SERCA1 translocation from CRD fractions, and (iii) prevents the Bcl-2 Delta 21-dependent loss of FITC labelling. Our data demonstrate that the mechanism of SERCA inactivation by Bcl-2 established in vitro for the SERCA1 isoform can be extended to the main housekeeping SERCA2b isoform, and that functional interactions of SERCA2b and Bc1-2 in the cell may be modulated by HSP70 and other chaperones and stress-regulated proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据