4.5 Article

Crystal structure of the glutamate receptor GluA1 N-terminal domain

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 438, 期 -, 页码 255-263

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20110801

关键词

alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid receptor (AM PAR); glutamate receptor; ion channel; N-terminal domain (ATD); structural biology

资金

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  2. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources
  3. National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  4. National Institutes of Health [R21AG033813, R01GM090023]
  5. Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship
  6. Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The AMPA (alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid) subfamily of iGluRs (ionotropic glutamate receptors) is essential for fast excitatory neurotransmission in the central nervous system. The malfunction of AMPARs (AMPA receptors) has been implicated in many neurological diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The active channels of AMPARs and other iGluR subfamilies are tetramers formed exclusively by assembly of subunits within the same subfamily. It has been proposed that the assembly process is controlled mainly by the extracellular ATD (N-terminal domain) of iGluR. In addition, ATD has also been implicated in synaptogenesis, iGluR trafficking and trans-synaptic signalling, through unknown mechanisms. We report in the present study a 2.5 angstrom (1 angstrom = 0.1 nm) resolution crystal structure of the ATD of GluA1. Comparative analyses of the structure of GluA1-AID and other subunits sheds light on our understanding of how ATD drives subfamily-specific assembly of AMPARs. In addition, analysis of the crystal lattice of CILIA] AID suggests a novel mechanism by which the ATD might participate in inter-tetramer AMPAR clustering, as well as in trans-synaptic protein protein interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据