4.5 Article

The tumour suppressor PTEN mediates a negative regulation of the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Nedd4

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 412, 期 -, 页码 331-338

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BJ20071403

关键词

apoptosis; feedback regulator; MS; neural-precursor-cell-expressed; developmentally down-regulated gene 4 (Nedd4); phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10 (PTEN); transcriptional regulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tumour suppressor PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10; a phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphatase) is a multifunctional protein deregulated in many types of cancer. It is suggested that a number of proteins that relate with PTEN functionally or physically have not yet been found. In order to search for PTEN-interacting proteins that might be crucial in the regulation of PTEN, we exploited a proteomics-based approach. PTEN-expressing NIH 3T3 cell lysates were used in affinity chromatography and then analysed by LC-ESI-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem MS). A total of 93 proteins were identified. Among the proteins identified, we concentrated on the E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase Nedd4 (neural-precursor-cell-expressed, developmentally down-regulated gene 4), and performed subsequent validation experiments using HeLa cells. Nedd4 inhibited PTEN-induced apoptotic cell death and, conversely, the Nedd4 level was down-regulated by PTEN. The down-regulation effect was diminished by a mutation (C124S) in the catalytic site of PTEN. Nedd4 expression was also decreased by a PI3K (phosphoinositide 3-kinase) inhibitor, LY294002, suggesting that the regulation is dependent on the phosphatase-kinase activity of the PTEN-PI3K/Akt pathway. Semi-quantitative real-time PCR analysis revealed that Nedd4 was transcriptionally regulated by PTEN. Thus our results have important implications regarding the roles of PTEN upon the E3 ubquitin ligase Nedd4 as a negative feedback regulator as well as a substrate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据