4.6 Article

Sequential introduction and dosage balance of defined transcription factors affect reprogramming efficiency from pancreatic duct cells into insulin-producing cells

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.01.083

关键词

Pdx1; Neurog3; Mafa; Reprogramming; Pancreatic duct cells; Insulin-producing cells

资金

  1. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation [10-2010-561]
  2. KAKENHI [25461348]
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Suzuken Memorial Foundation
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25461348] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the exogenous expression of a combination of transcription factors have been shown to induce the conversion of non-beta cells into insulin-producing cells, the reprogramming efficiency remains still low. In order to develop an in vitro screening system for an optimized reprogramming protocol, we generated the reporter cell line mPac-MIP-RFP in which the reprogramming efficiency can be quantified with red fluorescent protein expressed under the control of the insulin promoter. Analysis with mPac-MIP-RFP cells sequentially infected with adenoviruses expressing Pdx1, Neurog3, and Mafa revealed that expression of Pdx1 prior to Neurog3 or Mafa augments the reprogramming efficiency. Next, infection with a polycistronic adenoviral vector expressing Pdx1, Neurog3 and Mafa significantly increased the expression level of insulin compared with the simultaneous infection of three adenoviruses carrying each transcription factor, although excessive expression of Mafa together with the polycistronic vector dramatically inhibited the reprogramming into insulin-producing cells. Thus, in vitro screening with the mPac-MIP-RFP reporter cell line demonstrated that the timing and dosage of gene delivery with defined transcription factors influence the reprogramming efficiency. Further investigation should optimize the reprogramming conditions for the future cell therapy of diabetes. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据