4.6 Article

The transcription factor LEF-1 induces an epithelial-mesenchymal transition in MDCK cells independent of β-catenin

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.11.031

关键词

EMT; LEF-1; beta-Catenin; Slug; ZEB1

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan
  2. Kodama Memorial Found for Medical Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a key process in the tumor metastatic cascade, is characterized by the loss of cell-cell junctions and cell polarity, as well as the acquisition of migratory and invasive properties. LEF-1 is a member of the lymphoid enhancer-binding factor/T-cell factor (LEF/TCF) family of DNA-binding transcription factors, which interact with nuclear beta-catenin and act as central transcriptional mediators of Wnt signaling. To investigate the role of LEF-1 in EMT, we generated stable LEF-1 transfectants using MDCK cells. The transfectants had a spindle-shaped mesenchymal morphology, and enhanced migration and invasiveness relative to control cells. These EMT changes were accompanied by the downregulation of an epithelial marker protein, E-cadherin, and the upregulation of mesenchymal marker proteins, vimentin and N-cadherin. Consistent with these observations, the mRNA levels of Slug, ZEB1, and ZEB2-EMT-related transcription factors increased significantly. Although the N-terminally deleted mutant LEF-1 cannot interact with beta-catenin, it retained the ability to induce EMT. Consistent with these observations, neither the expression of a dominant negative beta-catenin/engrailed chimera, nor the expression of a cytoplasmic domain of E-cadherin that sequesters beta-catenin from binding to LEF/TCF, reversed LEF-1-induced EMT. Together, these data indicated that the nuclear function of beta-catenin was not necessary for the induction of Slug, ZEB1, and ZEB2 expression leading to EMT. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据