4.6 Article

Molecular cloning and functional characterization of a novel cotton CBL-interacting protein kinase gene (GhCIPK6) reveals its involvement in multiple abiotic stress tolerance in transgenic plants

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.04.080

关键词

Arabidopsis; Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum); CIPK6; Salt tolerance; Drought tolerance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31101185]
  2. National High-tech R&D Program of China (863 Program) [2013AA102601-4]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2010QC034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant CIPKs were specific Ser/Thr protein kinases, which were activated through interaction with calcineurin B-like protein (CBL) containing four EF hands for Ca2+ binding. The CBL/CIPK complexes play an important role in signal transduction in biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as developmental processes. Here a Ser/Thr protein kinase gene (defined as GhCIPK6), which was isolated from RNA-Seq profile during cotton somatic embryogenesis in our previous research was characterized. The GhCIPK6 gene contains an ORF of 1296 bp that putatively encodes a polypeptide of 431 amino acids with a predicted molecular mass of 48.46 kDa and isoelectric point of 9.12. Sequence alignment analysis confirmed that GhCIPK6 has no intron, and it was homologous to AtCIPK6. Expression analysis of the GhCIPK6 suggested that they might function in diverse tissues, including styles and anthers but not fibers. In addition, expression of the GhCIPK6 gene was induced by salt, drought and ABA treatments. Overexpression of GhCIPK6 significantly enhances the tolerance to salt, drought and ABA stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis, indicating that GhCIPK6 acts as a positive regulator in response to salt and drought stress, and is supposed to be a potential candidate gene to improve stress tolerance by genetic manipulation in cotton and other crops. (c) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据