4.6 Article

BRSK2 is regulated by ER stress in protein level and involved in ER stress-induced apoptosis

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.06.046

关键词

BRSK2; ER stress; Subcellular localization; Apoptosis; CHOP; Caspase-3

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81101810, 30771188]
  2. National Key Sci-Tech Special Project of China [2008ZX10002-020]
  3. National 973 Program of China [2004CB518605]
  4. National 863 Project of China [2006AA020501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The accumulation of unfolded protein in lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) triggers a cell stress response called ER stress, which induces the transcriptional up-regulation of a number of proteins, including molecular chaperones and folding enzymes, the global inhibition of protein synthesis, and the activation of apoptotic pathways. The molecular mechanism underlying the apoptotic response has remained largely elusive. AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK) has been implicated in ER stress-induced apoptosis through its role in attenuating ER stress. BRSK2 (brain selective kinase 2, also known as SAD-A) is a serine/threonine kinase of the AMPK family. Here, we demonstrate that the BRSK2 protein levels are significantly down-regulated in response to ER stress in PANC-1 and HeLa cells. Furthermore, we also observed that ER stress induces endogenous BRSK2 to localize to the ER. Importantly, knockdown of endogenous BRSK2 expression enhances ER stress-mediated apoptosis in cells while over express BRSK2 in wild type or kinase-dead type both reduce the apoptosis. BRSK2 knockdown increases the transcription of CHOP and the levels of cleaved caspase-3 in cells in response to ER stress while over expression of BRSK2 decrease CHOP mRNA and levels of cleaved caspase-3. Taken together, our findings demonstrate ER stress may reduce BRSK2 protein and change BRSK2 subcellular localization, which in turn alleviate ER stress-induced apoptosis. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据