4.6 Article

Structural Insight into Specificity of Interactions between Nonconventional Three-finger Weak Toxin from Naja kaouthia (WTX) and Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 290, 期 39, 页码 23616-23630

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M115.656595

关键词

-

资金

  1. Russian Academy of Sciences (Program Molecular and Cellular Biology)
  2. Russian Federation [SS-1766.2014.4, YC-6310.2015.4]
  3. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-04-00825, 14-04-31634]
  4. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [14-05696S]
  5. Institute of Physiology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic [RVO:67985823]
  6. Russian Scientific Foundation [14-14-00255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Weak toxin from Naja kaouthia (WTX) belongs to the group of nonconventional three-finger snake neurotoxins. It irreversibly inhibits nicotinic acetylcholine receptors and allosterically interacts with muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs). Using site-directed mutagenesis, NMR spectroscopy, and computer modeling, we investigated the recombinant mutant WTX analogue (rWTX) which, compared with the native toxin, has an additional N-terminal methionine residue. In comparison with the wild-type toxin, rWTX demonstrated an altered pharmacological profile, decreased binding of orthosteric antagonist N-methylscopolamine to human M1- and M2-mAChRs, and increased antagonist binding to M3-mAChR. Positively charged arginine residues located in the flexible loop II were found to be crucial for rWTX interactions with all types of mAChR. Computer modeling suggested that the rWTX loop II protrudes to the M1-mAChR allosteric ligand-binding site blocking the entrance to the orthosteric site. In contrast, toxin interacts with M3-mAChR by loop II without penetration into the allosteric site. Data obtained provide new structural insight into the target-specific allosteric regulation of mAChRs by three-finger snake neurotoxins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据