Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Maria Sofologi, Georgia Papantoniou, Theodora Avgita, Aikaterina Lyraki, Chrysoula Thomaidou, Harilaos Zaragas, Georgios Ntritsos, Panagiotis Varsamis, Konstantinos Staikopoulos, Georgios Kougioumtzis, Aphrodite Papantoniou, Despina Moraitou
Summary: This paper explores the psychometric properties of the Greek version of the Gifted Rating Scales-Preschool/Kindergarten Form (GRS-P) through data from two samples. The results show that the scales have excellent internal consistency, good factorial and convergent/discriminant validity. Additionally, it is found that the GRS-P is a reliable and valid tool for teachers to assess gifted students in a Greek cultural context.
Article
Orthopedics
Tung-Hee Albert Tie, Chih-Kai Hong, Illich Chua, Fa-Chuan Kuan, Wei-Ren Su, Kai-Lan Hsu
Summary: The validated Chinese version of the ASESp questionnaire is proven to be a reliable tool for assessing shoulder disorders, with excellent test-retest reliability, good internal consistency, and structural validity. The study concludes that ASESp-CH is highly correlated with the corresponding domains of the SF-36, except for the stability domain.
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS
(2021)
Article
Clinical Neurology
Shalom K. Henderson, Katie A. Peterson, Karalyn Patterson, Matthew A. Lambon Ralph, James B. Rowe
Summary: Verbal fluency is widely used as a clinical test, but its utility in differentiating between different types of dementia and primary progressive aphasia remains unclear. This study found that total word count was the strongest discriminator between patient groups and controls, while word frequency was the strongest discriminator for semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Overall, verbal fluency is an efficient test for assessing global brain-cognitive health but has limited utility in differentiating between cognitively and anatomically disparate patient groups.
BRAIN COMMUNICATIONS
(2023)
Article
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Lena Selgert, Bernd Bender, Barbara Hinding, Aline Federmann, Andre L. Mihaljevic, Rebekka Post, Ansgar Jonietz, John Norcini, Ara Tekian, Jana Juenger
Summary: This study aims to improve doctor-patient communication by developing and testing a standardized evaluation form to assess students' written communication skills. The results indicate the practicality of the evaluation form in enhancing future doctors' written communication abilities, but further adjustments and training are needed for inter-rater reliability among examiners.
GMS JOURNAL FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION
(2021)