4.6 Article

Transient disturbances in contextual fear memory induced by Aβ(25-35) in rats are accompanied by cholinergic dysfunction

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 259, 期 -, 页码 152-157

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.11.013

关键词

Medial septum; Amyloid-beta (25-35); Contextual fear conditioning; Choline acetyltransferase; Vesicular acetylcholine transporter; Cholinergic neurons; Cholinergic phenotype

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [13-04-01019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damage to the medial septum (MS) or disruption of the septo-hippocampal pathway is often considered as a basis for memory impairments, manifesting in the hippocampus-dependent behavioral paradigms. In the present study, we have examined the effects of intracerebroventricular administration of aggregated amyloid-beta (25-35) (A beta(25-35)) on contextual fear conditioning and the condition of cholinergic neurons in the MS using immunohistochemical detection of choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and expression of the cholinergic locus genes (ChAT and vesicular acetylcholine transporter (VaChT) mRNA). A single injection of A beta(25-35) induced transient moderate impairments in contextual fear conditioning accompanied by a decrease in ChAT expression. However, the long-term decline in ChAT and VaChT expression was not associated with stable impairments in contextual fear memory. An A beta(25-35)-induced progressive decrease in the number of ChAT expressing neurons in the MS was revealed, but no gross neuronal cell loss in the MS could be detected (as judged by the density of NeuN-immunoreactive cells). Thus, A beta(25-35) induced a loss of the cholinergic phenotype of septal neurons without neuronal cell death in MS. The data give an additional support to the concept of early impairments in the synthesis of proteins related to the cholinergic system as an important mechanism in amyloid-induced neuronal damage. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据