4.6 Article

Impaired conditioned emotional response and object recognition are concomitant to neuronal damage in the amygdala and perirhinal cortex in middle-aged ischemic rats

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 219, 期 2, 页码 227-233

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.01.009

关键词

Conditioned emotional response; Fear; Basolateral amygdala; Perirhinal cortex; Forebrain ischemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The current study characterizes fear conditioning responses following global ischemia and evaluates neuronal damage affecting discrete extra-hippocampal areas susceptible to contribute to post ischemic emotional and memory impairments. Conditioned emotional response, Barnes Maze and object recognition tests were used to assess emotional, spatial and recognition memory, respectively. Behavioural testing was initiated in middle-aged animals (10-12 month old) 1 week following sham (n = 16) or 4VO occlusion (n = 18). Post-mortem cellular assessment was performed in the hippocampal CA1 layer, the perirhinal cortex and basolateral amygdala. Middle-aged ischemic animals showed impaired spatial memory in the initial three testing days in the Barnes Maze and deficit in recognition memory. Of interest, ischemic rats demonstrated a significant reduction of freezing and increased locomotion during the contextual fear testing period, suggesting reduced fear in these animals. Assessment of neuronal density 40 days following global ischemia revealed that CM neuronal injury was accompanied by 20-25% neuronal loss in the basolateral nucleus of the amygdala and perirhinal cortex in middle-aged ischemic compared to sham-operated animals. This study represents the first demonstration of altered conditioned fear responses following ischemia. Our findings also indicate a vulnerability of extra-hippocampal neurons to ischemic injury, possibly contributing to discrete emotional and/or memory impairments post ischemia. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据