4.6 Article

Carbon chain length and the stimulus problem in olfaction

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 215, 期 1, 页码 110-113

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.007

关键词

Olfaction; Alcohols; Discrimination; Perception; Mixture

资金

  1. Monell Chemical Senses Center
  2. Swedish Research Council [VR 421-2005-1779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding how odour quality perception is encoded in its molecular properties arguably poses one of the most significant problems in olfaction. Determining the odour structure-quality relationships of structurally similar odorants could provide a key tool to this problem. We tentatively explored whether a mixture of two molecules, differing only in carbon chain length (C), would yield the same percept as a single odorant with an intermediate carbon chain length, akin to colour vision, or be perceived as a different quality. Ability to discriminate between pairs of iso-intense solutions of n-butanol (4C), n-propanol (3C), n-pentanol (5C), and an intermediate 50/50 molecular weight mixture of n-propanol and n-pentanol (3C/5C) was assessed in 20 healthy young adults. We found that participants were able to discriminate 4C from the 50/50 molecular weight mixture of n-propanol and n-pentanol (3C/5C), and also from the other alcohols. In conclusion, we successfully replicated previous data demonstrating that participants are able to discriminate between structurally similar alcohols, and, more importantly, the present study shows that an odour mixture of two molecules differing only in carbon chain length is clearly distinguishable from a single odorant with an intermediate carbon chain length. These findings suggest that although carbon chain length matters to odour quality, carbon chain length is not a physical continuum within homologous series of substances that corresponds to a single qualitative dimension akin to the wavelength-hue relation for monochromatic light. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据