4.6 Article

Contributions of the amygdala central nucleus and ventrolateral periaqueductal grey to freezing and instrumental suppression in Pavlovian fear conditioning

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 211, 期 1, 页码 111-117

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.020

关键词

Second-order; Associative; Conditioned suppression; Aversive

资金

  1. NIMH [MH53667]
  2. National Service Research Award [MH075302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In Pavlovian fear conditioning animals receive pairings of a neutral cue and an aversive stimulus such as an electric foot-shock. Through such pairings, the cue will come to elicit a central state of fear that produces a variety of autonomic and behavioral responses, among which are conditioned freezing and suppression of instrumental responding, termed conditioned suppression. The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) and the ventrolateral periaqueductal grey (vIPAG) has been strongly implicated in the acquisition and expression of conditioned fear. However, previous work suggests different roles for the CeA and vIPAG in fear learning maybe revealed when fear is assessed with conditioned freezing or conditioned suppression. To further explore this possibility we gave rats selective lesions of either the CeA or vIPAG and trained them in Pavlovian first-order fear conditioning as well as Pavlovian second-order fear conditioning. We concurrently assessed the acquisition of conditioned freezing and conditioned suppression. We found that vIPAG and CeA lesions impaired both first- and second-order conditioned freezing. VIPAG lesions did not impair, and CeA lesions only transiently impaired, first-order conditioned suppression. However, both vIPAG and CeA lesions impaired second-order conditioned suppression. These results suggest that the CeA and vIPAG are critically important to expressing fear through conditioned freezing but play different and less critical roles in expressing fear through conditioned suppression. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据