4.5 Article

Crowdsourcing contests: understanding the effect of competitors' participation history on their performance

期刊

BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
卷 33, 期 12, 页码 1383-1395

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0144929X.2014.883551

关键词

crowdsourcing contests; participation history; competitors' performance; participation frequency; participation recency; winning frequency; winning recency; last performance; tenure; TopCoder

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crowdsourcing contests have become increasingly important and prevalent with the ubiquity of the Internet. Designing efficient crowdsourcing contests is not possible without the deep understanding of the factors affecting individuals' continuous participation and their performance. Prior studies have mainly focused on identifying the effect of task-specific, environment-specific, organisation-specific, and individual-specific factors on individuals' performance in crowdsourcing contests. And to our knowledge, there are no or very few studies on evaluating the effect of individuals' participation history on their performance. This paper aims to address this research gap using a data set from TopCoder. This study derives competitors' participation history factors, such as participation frequency, participation recency, winning frequency, winning recency, tenure, and last performance to construct models depicting effects of these factors on competitors' performance in online crowdsourcing contests. The research findings demonstrate that most of competitors' participation history factors have significant effect on their performance. This paper also indicates that competitors' participation frequency and winning frequency moderate the relationship between last performance and performance, and relationship between tenure and performance positively. On the other hand, individuals' participation recency and winning recency moderate relationship between last performance and performance negatively, but have no significant effect on the relationship between tenure and performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据