4.3 Article

Dead heterospecifics as cues of risk in the environment: Does size affect response?

期刊

BEHAVIOUR
卷 151, 期 1, 页码 1-22

出版社

BRILL ACADEMIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-00003120

关键词

Aphelocoma californica; bird; cacophonous aggregation; cues of risk; dead conspecific; response to dead; risk assessment; western scrub-jay

资金

  1. University of California (UC) Davis Jastro-Shields research award
  2. UC Davis Center for Population Biology Student Research Funding
  3. UC Davis Animal Behavior Graduate Group Student Fellowships
  4. UC Davis Eugene Cota-Robles Scholarship
  5. Gates Millennium Graduate Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Organisms can minimize their exposure to risk of death or injury by assessing their environment and modifying their behavior accordingly. There is evidence that the current or recent presence of a predator introduces cues to the environment that organisms may use in risk assessment. However, we know little about whether terrestrial organisms use the remains of victims of predation as one such cue of elevated predation risk. A previous study showed that western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica) respond both to dead conspecifics and to encounters with a predator with alarm calling and aggregation (cacophonous aggregations), suggesting that they use dead conspecifics as indirect evidence of predation risk. Here we examine whether western scrub-jays also use dead heterospecifics as an indicator of risk. We find that jays respond with cacophonous aggregations to dead sympatric and allopatric jay-size heterospecifics but react weakly if at all to smaller heterospecifics. This suggests that size may be an important factor in determining whether a dead heterospecific is a relevant cue of risk. To our knowledge this is the first controlled experiment showing an animal using the visual cue provided by a dead heterospecific as an indicator of risk and communicating this risk to other conspecifics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据