4.5 Article

O brother, where art thou? The varying influence of older siblings in rank acquisition by female baboons

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 1, 页码 97-104

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0824-4

关键词

Baboon; Rank acquisition; Brothers; Sisters; Orphans; Male investment in kin

资金

  1. NIH [MH62249]
  2. University of Pennsylvania [19001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Males in sexually dimorphic species like baboons appear to have surprisingly little influence on the reproduction and dominance ranks of their female kin, even though they could potentially increase their fitness by helping their relatives improve their ranks. Male baboons are able to dominate females several years before they emigrate, but their presence has no effect on relatives' dominance ranks, at least when female kin are present. As a result, females usually acquire ranks within their matriline, above their older sisters. We describe the process of rank acquisition among orphaned and non-orphaned juvenile and adolescent females in a group of free-ranging baboons. Orphaned females were significantly more likely than non-orphaned females to acquire unexpected ranks. Orphaned females with older sisters often acquired ranks within the matriline, but below their older sisters'. Orphaned females with older brothers were likely to rise in rank above their matriline. Females' interventions on behalf of younger sisters always supported the existing female dominance hierarchy, while males' interventions tended to act against it. Similarly, in playback experiments, females appeared to be willing to support their younger sister only in disputes with lower-ranking females. In contrast, males appeared to be willing to support their sister even in disputes with higher-ranking females. Fraternal support enables females to improve their dominance ranks, but only if their mothers have died. It remains a puzzle why males have so little influence on their female relatives' ranks when female kin are present, and so much when they are absent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据