4.8 Article

Stimulation of autophagy by autoantibody-mediated activation of death receptor cascades

期刊

AUTOPHAGY
卷 4, 期 5, 页码 715-716

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/auto.6336

关键词

macroautophagy; autoimmunity; fas; diabetic neuropathy; neurogenic chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction; autoantibodies; LC3/Atg8; FADD; neuroblastoma cells; SH-SY5Y

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [UL1 RR024986, M01-RR-00042, UL1RR024986] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [R01-052387, R01-056997] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of membrane death receptors has been connected to apoptosis and, recently, other non-apoptotic events. For example, we reported recently that sera from either a subset of patients with type 2 diabetes with neuropathy or a subpopulation of patients with neurogenic chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIP) stimulate autophagy in SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cells via complement-independent; autoantibody-mediated activation of Fas (CD95). Activation of the Fas pathway causes minimal activation of apoptosis in these cells since procaspase-8 shows low constitutive levels of expression in neuroblastoma cells. The observation that anti-Fas autoantibodies induce autophagy is novel and provocative. This finding has implications regarding the pathophysiology of diabetic neuropathy, CIP and, perhaps, other autoimmune disorders. For example, recent reports suggest that expression or activity of proapoptotic caspases can be enhanced by activation of more than one membrane death receptor, as could happen by combinations of cytokines and autoantibodies. The observation that autophagy, a putative cytoprotective pathway that has also been implicated in non-apoptotic cell death, is activated by autoantibodies against Fas, may represent an early cellular protective response. An increase in cytotoxic cytokine levels or the ratio of agonist:antagonist autoantibodies may tip the balance of the cellular response to activation of programmed cell death pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据