4.1 Article

Systemic inflammation and circadian rhythm of cardiac autonomic modulation

期刊

AUTONOMIC NEUROSCIENCE-BASIC & CLINICAL
卷 162, 期 1-2, 页码 72-76

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2011.03.002

关键词

C-reactive protein; Inflammatory marker; Heart rate variability; Periodic regression; Random-effects model; Meta-analysis; Community population

资金

  1. NIH [1 R01 ES014010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Systemic inflammation (SI) is associated with impairment of cardiac autonomic modulation (CAM), which is associated with cardiac disease. However, there is limited data about SI on CAM circadian pattern, which this study aimed to investigate in a middle-aged sample. C-reactive protein (CRP) was used as a SI marker. We performed HRV analysis on each 5-min segment RRs from a 24-h 12-lead ECG to obtain time and frequency domain HRV indices as measures of CAM. The circadian pattern of CAM was analyzed by a two-stage modeling. Stage one, for each individual we fit a cosine periodic model based on the 288 segments of 5-min HRV data to produce three individual-level cosine parameters that quantity the circadian pattern: mean (M), amplitude (A), and acrophase time (theta), measure the overall average, the amplitude of the oscillation, and the timing of the highest oscillation, respectively. Stage two, we used random-effects-meta-analysis to summarize the effects of CRP on the three circadian parameters obtained in stage one. CRP was adversely associated with lower M of log-HF, log-LF, SDNN, and RMSSD [beta (SE): -022 (0.07) ms(2), -0.20 (0.06) ms(2), -3.62 (0.99) ms, and -2.32 (0.73) ms, respectively, with all p-values <0.01]. More importantly, CRP was also adversely associated with lower <(A)over cap> of SDNN and RMSSD [beta (SE): -0.84 (0.44) ms and -0.86 (0.38) ms, respectively, both p-values <0.05]. SI is adversely associated with circadian pattern of CAM, suggesting that the cardiac risk associated with SI may be partially mediated via inflammation-related changes in CAM. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据