4.1 Article

Myogenic activity in autoregulation during low frequency oscillations

期刊

AUTONOMIC NEUROSCIENCE-BASIC & CLINICAL
卷 159, 期 1-2, 页码 104-110

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.autneu.2010.07.029

关键词

Cardiovascular control; Mayer waves; Heart rate oscillations; Myogenic response; Total peripheral resistance

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canadian Institute of Health Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lower body negative pressure (LBNP) was applied in eight human subjects to trigger low frequency oscillations in order to study the nature of functional coupling between the hemodynamic and autonomic nervous systems, with particular focus on how the myogenic response fits within this coupling. To this end muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac output (CO), and total peripheral resistance (TPR) were measured at baseline and during LBNP and were then examined in both the time and frequency domains. At the height of low frequency oscillations (similar to 0.1 Hz) there was a strong coupling between all the five indices, marked by perfect alignment of their oscillatory frequencies. Results in the time domain show that a fall in MAP is followed by a fall in TPR at 1.58s SD 0.69), a rise in heart rate at 2.64s (SD 0.98), a rise in cardiac output at 3.72 s (SD 0.60), a peak in MSNA at 5.71 s (SD 1.27) and, finally, a rise in TPR at 7.13 s (SD 1.02). A possible interpretation of the latter is that a drop in MAP first triggers a drop in TPR via a myogenic response before the expected rise in TPR via a rise in MSNA. In other words, following a drop in arterial pressure, myogenic response controls vessel diameter before this control is taken over by MSNA. These findings provide a possible resolution of a longstanding conceptual argument against attributing a significant role for the myogenic response in blood flow autoregulation. (C) 2010 Elsevier By. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据