4.0 Article

Latitudinal and insular variation in morphology of a small Australian passerine: consequences for dispersal distance and conservation

期刊

AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY
卷 60, 期 3, 页码 210-218

出版社

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/ZO12078

关键词

Bergmann's Rule; honeyeater; Island Rule; morphometric; nomad; salt marsh; white-fronted chat

类别

资金

  1. Hermon Slade Foundation
  2. Lake Macquarie City Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dispersal ability is a fundamental attribute of threatened species that influences their prognosis for survival in fragmented habitats. More vagile species are considered to be under lower threat from habitat fragmentation than more sedentary species. This study investigates morphological variation amongst island and mainland populations of a threatened Australian passerine, the white-fronted chat (Epthianura albifrons), to review previous conclusions about levels of population differentiation and consequent conclusions about dispersal ability. Standard body measurements were taken from wild-caught birds from three islands and three mainland regions of Australia, ranging over a latitudinal distance of 1150 km and a longitudinal distance of 3300 km. Significant size variation in wing, bill and headbill lengths were found amongst populations, revealing a significant latitudinal trend consistent with 'Bergmann's Rule'. Even after accounting for the latitudinal trend, island populations showed significant differentiation from mainland populations in some attributes, although island populations were not consistently larger than mainland populations, as predicted by the 'Island Rule'. Alack of size variation between island and mainland museum specimens has historically been used to conclude that white-fronted chats are capable of crossing an oceanic barrier of at least 30 km. The level of population differentiation identified in this study suggests that previous estimates of dispersal capacity may be overestimated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据