4.3 Article

Genetic variability of descriptors for grapevine berry acidity in Riesling, Gewurztraminer and their progeny

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajgw.12051

关键词

acidity evolution; degree day; grapevine; malic acid; tartaric acid

资金

  1. FranceAgrimer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims: The acidity of harvested grapevine berries is likely to decrease in the future because of increasing temperature during grape ripening. The aim of the study was to evaluate the genetic variability of berry acidity descriptors in progeny from a Riesling x Gewurztraminer cross. Methods and Results: The ripening process for the parent cultivars was monitored over three growing seasons; berries from Riesling had a higher tartaric acid concentration than that from Gewurztraminer, and a similar difference was observed for malic acid. A statistical model describing the decline in malic acid concentration over time was fitted to the data. With this model, the parameter that best characterised the two genotypes was the asymptotic minimum value of malic acid concentration per g of berry dry matter. In addition, the rate of decrease of malic acid was constant across years when thermal-time scales were used. Using samples of green berries at veraison and samples picked 230 degree days after veraison (mean temperature, base 10 degrees C), 120 genotypes from a Riesling x Gewurztraminer progeny were compared over 3 years in the vineyard and segregations for all the berry acidity descriptors were described. Conclusions: A significant genotypic variability was observed for the concentration of malic and tartaric acids but also for the estimated cationic content of the berries for the same developmental stage. No genotypes, however, were detected, with a concentration of total malic and tartaric acid significantly higher than that of Riesling. Significance of the Study: These results show that berry acidity descriptors are heritable traits that can be manipulated in breeding programs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据