4.7 Article

Background concentrations and source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in south-eastern Finland

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT
卷 45, 期 20, 页码 3391-3399

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.050

关键词

PAH; PM10; Air quality; Background areas; Positive matrix factorization

资金

  1. Tor and Maj Nessling foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH compounds) were measured in the PM10 fraction [from ambient air] at Virolahti, Finland. The sampling site is located in a rural area in the south-eastern corner of Finland, near the Russian border. Altogether, 51 daily and 85 weekly filter samples were collected in 2007-2008. The yearly average concentration of benzo(a)pyrene at Virolahti in 2007 was 0.21 ng m(-3), which is well below the annual target value of 1 ng m(-3) set by the European Union. The positive matrix factorization (PMF) method was applied in source apportionment for daily PAH data combined with other pollutant data. A three-factor solution of the PMF analysis with 28 components was chosen. These three factors were identified as long-range transported secondary particles (F1), combustion (F2) and a sea-salt factor (F3). The conditional probability function (CPF) was used to combine wind direction sectors with the PMF factors. In cases F1 and F2, pollutants mainly originated from the south-east, whereas pollutants in F3 came from the south-western sector. PAHs entered into the combustion factor 2 together with SO2, NOx, black carbon and potassium. This suggests that the PAHs at Virolahti originated from traffic and industrial pollution, as well as biomass burning. Elevated concentrations occurred throughout the winter period and most frequently originated from the south-eastern sector between 90 degrees-135 degrees. This sector includes, among other transboundary areas, the metropolis of St. Petersburg at a distance of 160 km. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据