4.0 Article

A Model Simulation of Future Oceanic Conditions along the British Columbia Continental Shelf. Part II: Results and Analyses

期刊

ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN
卷 52, 期 1, 页码 20-38

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/07055900.2013.873014

关键词

regional climate model; British Columbia ocean circulation model; upwelling; downwelling; sea level rise; eddies; estuarine flow; buoyancy currents

资金

  1. Centre for Ocean Model Development for Application (COMDA) within Fisheries and Oceans Canada (FOC)
  2. Climate Change Science Initiative
  3. Aquatic Climate Change Adaptation Services Program within FOC
  4. Ecosystem Research Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An ocean circulation model for the British Columbia continental shelf is run with future initial conditions and forcing fields downscaled from the North American Regional Climate Change Assessment Program archive. Average seasonal sea surface temperatures for the period 2065 to 2078 are projected to increase by between 0.5 degrees and 2.0 degrees C with respect to analogous averages from 1995 to 2008. Seasonal sea surface salinities are projected to decrease by as much as 2.0 over the same period, though there are some regions where and periods when small increases are projected. Though stronger winter winds result in larger Haida Eddies, slightly stronger summer winds along the western Vancouver Island shelf do not result in appreciable changes to either the cross-shelf upwelling or to the magnitude of Juan de Fuca Eddies or the timing of their formation. However, increased flows are projected in some seasons for the Rose Spit, Middle Bank, and Goose Island Bank eddies. More precipitation over the watersheds emptying into coastal waters produces larger freshwater discharges and, in particular, a stronger estuarine flow in Juan de Fuca Strait and a stronger Vancouver Island Coastal Current. Generally increasing winds and decreasing density mean that the winter minus summer range of sea surface heights is projected to increase all along the coast.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据