4.0 Article

Declining Oxygen on the British Columbia Continental Shelf

期刊

ATMOSPHERE-OCEAN
卷 51, 期 1, 页码 88-103

出版社

CMOS-SCMO
DOI: 10.1080/07055900.2012.753028

关键词

hypoxia; oxygen; Gulf of Alaska; Vancouver Island; Juan de Fuca

资金

  1. Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) Climate Change Science Initiative

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first thorough examination of oxygen concentrations in Canadian waters of the Pacific Ocean reveals several patterns in space and time. Sub-surface concentrations of oxygen tend to be lower in shelf waters than in deep-sea waters on the same isopycnal and lower in southern waters of the continental shelf than farther north. The lowest near-bottom concentration was 0.7 ml L-1 (31 mu mol kg(-1)) in mid-shelf waters in summer off southwest Vancouver Island in the Juan de Fuca Eddy region. Oxygen concentration there declined at a rate of 0.019 ml L-1 y(-1) (0.83 mu mol kg(-1) y(-1)) from 1979 to 2011. This decline is attributed mainly to changes in oxygen concentrations on the same density surfaces, rather than to changes in the depth of constant-density surfaces. A numerical simulation of ocean currents and nutrient concentrations in and surrounding the Juan de Fuca Eddy in summer reveals persistent upwelling into the centre of this eddy and slow bottom currents within the eddy. Upwelled water at bottom of the Juan de Fuca Eddy has water properties associated with the California Undercurrent on the 26.6 sigma-t surface at 200 m depth, where oxygen concentration is typically 2.0 ml L-1 (87 mu mol kg(-1)) and declined at a rate of 0.025 ml L-1 y(-1) (1.1 mu mol kg(-1) y(-1)) from 1981 to 2011, mainly as a result of changes on constant-density surfaces rather than to uplifting isopycnals. We propose that upwelling advects deep, oxygen-poor water onto the continental shelf bottom, and the slow bottom currents allow time for oxidation of organic material in bottom waters to further reduce the oxygen concentration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据