4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Post-prandial lipid metabolism, lipid-modulating agents and cerebrovascular integrity: Implications for dementia risk

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS SUPPLEMENTS
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 49-54

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2010.04.002

关键词

Chylomicrons; Amyloid-beta; Alzheimer's disease; Blood-brain barrier

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid-beta (A beta) is secreted as an apolipoprotein of nascent triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRL) derived from both liver and intestine, but is better recognized as the principal protein component of senile plaque in subjects with Alzheimer's disease. Recent studies suggest that exaggerated exposure to plasma A beta can compromise cerebrovascular integrity, resulting thereafter in blood to brain delivery of plasma proteins including TRL-A beta. Parenchymal deposits of A beta show significant immunoreactivity to apolipoprotein B (apo B), consistent with the notion of lipoprotein-A beta entrapment. In wild type mice chronically fed physiologically relevant diets, saturated fats (SFA) enhance chylomicron-A beta concomitant with disturbances in blood-brain barrier integrity. Similarly, dietary cholesterol promotes cerebrovascular extravasation of apo B lipoprotein-A beta. In this study, we investigated the effects of Atorvastatin, Pravastatin and Probucol on dietary-fat induced disturbances in BBB function. Atorvastatin, a lipid soluble HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor prevented SFA induced parenchymal extravasation of apo B-A beta at 28 days when incorporated into the diet at 20 mg/kg. In contrast, Pravastatin a water soluble agent had no effect on BBB integrity at an equivalent dose. In cholesterol supplemented mice, Probucol maintained BBB function and extravasation of apo B-A beta was not evident. The findings suggest that some lipid-modulating agents may be effective in ameliorating the negative effects of saturated fats and cholesterol on cerebrovascular integrity. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据