4.5 Article

Explained variance in the thermoregulatory responses to exercise: the independent roles of biophysical and fitness/fatness-related factors

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 119, 期 9, 页码 982-989

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00281.2015

关键词

body morphology; core temperature; evaporation; heat balance; sweating

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [386143-2010]
  2. NSERC Postgraduate Doctoral Scholarship (PGS-D)
  3. University of Ottawa Excellence Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Individual variation in the thermoregulatory responses to exercise is notoriously large. Although aerobic fitness ((V) over dot(O2 max)) and body fatness are traditionally considered important predictors of individual core temperature and sweating responses, recent evidence indicates potentially important and independent roles for biophysical factors. Using stepwise regression, we examined the proportion of individual variability in rectal temperature changes (Delta T-re), whole body sweat loss (WBSL), and steady-state local sweat rate (LSRss) independently described by 1) biophysical factors associated with metabolic heat production (H-prod) and evaporative heat balance requirements (E-req) relative to body size and 2) factors independently related to (V) over dot(O2 max) and body fatness. In a total of 69 trials, 28 males of wide-ranging morphological traits and (V) over dot(O2 max) values cycled at workloads corresponding to a range of absolute H-prod (410-898 W) and relative intensities (32.2-82.0% (V) over dot(O2 max)) for 60 min in 24.8 +/- 0.7 degrees C and 33.4 +/- 12.2% relative humidity. H-prod (in W/kg total body mass) alone described similar to 50% of the variability in Delta T-re (adjusted to r(2) = 0.496; P < 0.001), whereas surface area-to-mass ratio and body fat percentage (BF%) explained an additional 4.3 and 2.3% of variability, respectively. For WBSL, E-req (in W) alone explained similar to 71% of variance (adjusted to r(2) = 0.713, P < 0.001), and the inclusion of BF% explained an additional 1.3%. Similarly, E-req (in W/m(2)) correlated significantly with LSRss (adjusted to r(2) = 0.603, P < 0.001), whereas %(V) over dot(O2 max) described an additional similar to 4% of total variance. In conclusion, biophysical parameters related to H-prod, E-req, and body size explain 54-71% of the individual variability in Delta T-re, WBSL, and LSRss, and only 1-4% of additional variance is explained by factors related to fitness or fatness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据