4.5 Article

Muscle-specific glucose and free fatty acid uptake after sprint interval and moderate-intensity training in healthy middle-aged men

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 9, 页码 1172-1180

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01122.2014

关键词

HIT; exercise; metabolism; skeletal muscle; glucose uptake

资金

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. University of Turku
  3. Abo Akademi University
  4. Academy of Finland [251399, 251572, 256470, 281440, 283319]
  5. Paavo Nurmi Foundation
  6. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  7. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  8. European Foundation
  9. Hospital District of Southwest Finland
  10. Orion Research Foundation
  11. Finnish Cardiovascular Foundation
  12. Finnish Diabetes Foundation
  13. Ministry of Education of the State of Finland
  14. Turku University Hospital
  15. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0004987] Funding Source: researchfish
  16. Academy of Finland (AKA) [251572] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We tested the hypothesis that sprint interval training (SIT) causes larger improvements in glucose and free fatty acid uptake (FFAU) in lower and upper body muscles than moderate-intensity training (MIT). Twenty-eight healthy, untrained, middle-aged men were randomized into SIT (n = 14, 4-6 x 30 s of all-out cycling/4 min recovery) and MIT groups [n = 14, 40-60 min cycling at 60% of peak O-2 uptake (VO2 peak)] and completed six training sessions within 2 wk. Pre-and post measurements included VO2 (peak), whole body (M-value), muscle-specific insulin- stimulated glucose uptake (GU), and fasting FFAU measured with positron emission tomography in thigh [quadriceps femoris (QF) and hamstrings] and upper body (deltoids, biceps, and triceps brachii) muscles. V-O2 (peak) and M-value improved significantly by 6 and 12% in SIT, and 3 and 8% in MIT, respectively,. GU increased significantly only in the QF, and there was no statistically significant difference between the training modes. GU increased in all four heads of QF in response to SIT, but only in the vasti muscles in response to MIT, whereas in rectus femoris the response was completely lacking. Training response in FFAU in QF was smaller and nonsignificant, but it also differed between the training modes in the rectus femoris. In conclusion, SIT and MIT increased insulin-stimulated GU only in the main working muscle QF and not in the upper body muscles. In addition, the biarticular rectus femoris did not respond to moderate intensity training, reflecting most probably poor activation of it during moderate-intensity cycling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据