4.5 Article

Identification of a conserved set of upregulated genes in mouse skeletal muscle hypertrophy and regrowth

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 1, 页码 86-97

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00351.2014

关键词

transcriptome; mechanotransduction; stress response; extracellular matrix; hind-limb suspension

资金

  1. Merck
  2. [AR45617]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to compare the gene expression profile of mouse skeletal muscle undergoing two forms of growth (hypertrophy and regrowth) with the goal of identifying a conserved set of differentially expressed genes. Expression profiling by microarray was performed on the plantaris muscle subjected to 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 days of hypertrophy or regrowth following 2 wk of hind-limb suspension. We identified 97 differentially expressed genes (>= 2-fold increase or >= 50% decrease compared with control muscle) that were conserved during the two forms of muscle growth. The vast majority (similar to 90%) of the differentially expressed genes was upregulated and occurred at a single time point (64 out of 86 genes), which most often was on the first day of the time course. Microarray analysis from the conserved upregulated genes showed a set of genes related to contractile apparatus and stress response at day 1, including three genes involved in mechanotransduction and four genes encoding heat shock proteins. Our analysis further identified three cell cycle-related genes at day and several genes associated with extracellular matrix (ECM) at both days 3 and 10. In conclusion, we have identified a core set of genes commonly upregulated in two forms of muscle growth that could play a role in the maintenance of sarcomere stability, ECM remodeling, cell proliferation, fast-to-slow fiber type transition, and the regulation of skeletal muscle growth. These findings suggest conserved regulatory mechanisms involved in the adaptation of skeletal muscle to increased mechanical loading.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据