4.6 Article

The role of apoptosis in LDL transport through cultured endothelial cell monolayers

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 208, 期 2, 页码 335-341

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.07.051

关键词

LDL permeability; Water flux; Leaky junctions; Endothelial cells; Apoptosis

资金

  1. NIH [HL 57093]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown that leaky junctions associated with dying or dividing cells are the dominant pathway for low density lipoprotein (LDL) transport under convective conditions, accounting for more than 90% of the transport [Cancel LM, Fitting A, Tarbell JM. In vitro study of LDL transport under pressurized (convective) conditions. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2007; 293: H126-32]. To explore the role of apoptosis in the leaky junction pathway, TNF alpha and cycloheximide (TNF alpha/CHX) were used to induce an elevated rate of apoptosis in cultured bovine aortic endothelial cell (BAEC) monolayers and the convective fluxes of LDL and water were measured. Treatment with TNF alpha/CHX induced a 18.3-fold increase in apoptosis and a 4.4-fold increase in LDL permeability. Increases in apoptosis and permeability were attenuated by treatment with the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK. Water flux increased by 2.7-fold after treatment with TNF alpha/CHX, and this increase was not attenuated by treatment with Z-VAD-FMK. Immunostaining of the tight junction protein ZO-1 showed that TNF alpha/CHX treatment disrupts the tight junction in addition to inducing apoptosis. This disruption is present even when Z-VAD-FMK is used to inhibit apoptosis, and likely accounts for the increase in water flux. We found a strong correlation between the rate of apoptosis and the permeability of BAEC monolayers to LDL. These results demonstrate the potential of manipulating endothelial monolayer permeability by altering the rate of apoptosis pharmacollogicaly. This has implications for the treatment of atherosclerosis. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据