4.6 Article

Vascular dysfunction and alteration of novel and classic cardiovascular risk factors in mothers of growth restricted offspring

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 205, 期 1, 页码 244-250

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.10.006

关键词

Lipids; Inflammation; Pregnancy; Vascular function

资金

  1. Chest Heart Stroke Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Offspring and maternal birthweight are inversely associated with maternal cardiovascular disease. However, whether established or putative novel cardiovascular risk factors including vascular and metabolic function are disrupted in women who delivered small for gestational age (SGA) offspring is unknown. Methods: Case control study with analysis of inflammatory, lipid, metabolic and haemostatic markers and microvascular function as assessed by laser Doppler iontophoresis 4 years after the index pregnancy in 28 mothers who delivered SGA offspring at term and 29 matched controls. Results: Delivery of a SGA infant was associated with altered lipids [triglyceride median (IQR) mmol/l; control 0.64 (0.49-0.84); SGA 0.95 (0.67-0.95), p = 0.012] [cholesterol: HDL ratio: control 2.64 (2.10-3.10); SGA 3.06 (2.65-3.89), p = 0.013], systolic blood pressure [control mmHg: 110 (108-118); SGA 120 (110-130), p = 0.031], subclinical inflammation [CRP mg/l: control 0.7 (0.3-2.1): SGA 2.2 (1.2-4.0), p = 0.002] [IL-6 pg/ml: control 1.2 (0.8-1.4); SGA 1.5 (1.1-2.2), p = 0.009] and endothelial activation [ICAM-1 ng/ml: control 237.7 (210.0-279.4); SGA 283.1 (240.5-366.3), p = 0.013], with differences robust to confounder adjustment. Endothelium dependent (p = 0.003) and independent microvascular function (p < 0.001) were also impaired in mothers of SGA offspring. Conclusions: Mothers of term SGA offspring exhibit perturbation of metabolic and vascular function, which may underlie a lifelong trajectory of impaired health incorporating adverse perinatal and cardiovascular events. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据