4.6 Article

Differential anti-atherosclerotic effects in the innominate artery and aortic sinus by the liver X receptor agonist T0901317

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 203, 期 1, 页码 59-66

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.05.058

关键词

Hypertriglyceridemia; Atherosclerosis; LXRs

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [AT00850, CA58073]
  2. Anagen Therapeutics Inc

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of liver X receptors (LXRs) has been reported to reduce atherosclerosis in mouse models. However, this can be associated with enhanced liver de novo lipogenesis and elevation of plasma triglyceride-rich VLDL, which may limit its clinical use. In this study, we administered orally the LXR agonise T0901317 to male LDLR-/- mice fed a Western diet. This induced a persistent enhanced hypertriglyceridemia by largely increasing plasma triglyceride-rich VLDL. T0901317 treatment decreased atherosclerosis with a much more pronounced response and dose dependence in the innominate artery than in the aortic sinus. Lesions in the innominate artery were less complex containing mostly macrophage foam cells in T0901317-treated mice. However, in the aortic root, a significant reduction of atherosclerosis was seen only in the right coronary-related aortic sinus (RC) of T0901317-treated mice. Increasing the dose of T0901317 did not extend atheroprotection to the other sinuses of the aortic root. Lesions in the RC were less complex both in T0901317 and vehicle-treated mice with macrophage foam cells predominating. On the other hand, in T0901317-treated mice, the left coronary-related sinus (LC) lesions while not reduced in size, were more complex with a large fibrous cap and necrotic core, more collagen-positive areas, and variable macrophage foam cell content compared to vehicle-treated mice. These data suggest that activation of LXR by T0901317 had differential anti-atherosclerotic effects in two arterial regions in mice with hypertriglyceridemia. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据