4.6 Article

Epidermal growth factor stimulates Rac1 and p21-activated kinase in vascular smooth muscle cells

期刊

ATHEROSCLEROSIS
卷 196, 期 1, 页码 92-97

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.02.003

关键词

epidermal growth factor; vascular smooth muscle cells; Rho-family G-proteins; Rac; Cdc42; P21-activated kinase; Jnk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) has been shown to be a potent mitogen for vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) both in vitro and in vivo, thus contributing to the development of atherosclerosis and hypertension. Stimulation of Rho-family GTPases Rac/Cdc42 exerts pleiotropic cellular effects and have been demonstrated to contribute to EGF-induced proliferation in other cell systems. However, the effect of EGF on Rac/Cdc42 activation is unknown for VSMC. In the present report, we evaluated stimulation of Rac/Cdc42 by EGF in VSMC performing PAK-PBD binding assay. EGF treatment of VSMC induced time and concentration dependent binding of GTP-bound Rac1 to PAK-PBD peaking at 1 min and showing sustained activation up to 15 min. However, stimulation of Cdc42 could not be demonstrated. To further evaluate downstream effectors of Rac1 stimulation of p21-activated kinase (PAK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) by EGF was determined. In VSMC, EGF sequentially stimulated PAK, peaking at 5 min, and JNK, peaking at 15 min. Pretreatment of VSMC by EGF receptor specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor AG1478 and non-specific tyrosine kinase inhibitor genistem inhibited EGF-induced activation of Rac1, PAK and JNK, whereas tyrosine kinase inhibitors specific for Src (PP1) and specific for platelet-derived growth factor (AG1296) had no effect. Specific inhibition or Rac1 by NSC23766 attenuated EGF-induced [H-3] thymidine incorporation in VSMC. Our data provide evidence for EGF-induced Rac1 activation and implicate PAK and JNK as downstream targets of Rac1 in EGF signal transduction in VSMC. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据