4.7 Article

GAS-PHASE SEQUESTRATION OF NOBLE GASES IN THE PROTOSOLAR NEBULA: POSSIBLE CONSEQUENCES ON THE OUTER SOLAR SYSTEM COMPOSITION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 777, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/29

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; astrochemistry; comets: general; molecular processes; planets and satellites: formation

资金

  1. Programme National de Planetologie
  2. CNES
  3. GENCI-CINES [2012-085128]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We address the problem of the sequestration of Ar, Kr, and Xe by H-3(+) in the gas-phase conditions encountered during the cooling of protoplanetary disks when H-3(+) is competing with other species present in the same environment. Using high-level ab initio simulations, we try to quantify other sequestration possibilities involving He, H-5(+), H2O, and H3O+ present in the protosolar nebula. Apart from the fact that H-3(+) complexes formed with heavy noble gases are found to be by far much more stable than those formed with He or H2O, we show that H2D+ and H3O+, both products of the reactions of H-3(+) with HD and H2O, can also be efficient trapping agents for Ar, Kr, and Xe. Meanwhile, the abundance profile of H-3(+) in the outer part of the nebula is revisited with the use of an evolutionary accretion disk model that allows us to investigate the possibility that heavy noble gases can be sequestered by H-3(+) at earlier epochs than those corresponding to their trapping in planetesimals. We find that H-3(+) might be abundant enough in the outer protosolar nebula to trap Xe and Kr prior their condensation epochs, implying that their abundances should be solar in Saturn's current atmosphere and below the observational limit in Titan. The same scenario predicts that comets formed at high heliocentric distances should also be depleted in Kr and Xe. In situ measurements, such as those planed with the Rosetta mission on 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, will be critical to check the validity of our hypotheses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据