4.7 Article

ON THE DISTANCE OF THE MAGELLANIC CLOUDS USING CEPHEID NIR AND OPTICAL-NIR PERIOD-WESENHEIT RELATIONS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 764, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/764/1/84

关键词

Magellanic Clouds; stars: distances; stars: oscillations; stars: variables: Cepheids

资金

  1. PRIN-INAF
  2. PRIN-MIUR [2010LY5N2T]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23684005] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the largest near-infrared (NIR) data sets, JHKs, ever collected for classical Cepheids in the Magellanic Clouds (MCs). We selected fundamental (FU) and first overtone (FO) pulsators, and found 4150 (2571 FU, 1579 FO) Cepheids for Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and 3042 (1840 FU, 1202 FO) for Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC). Current sample is 2-3 times larger than any sample used in previous investigations with NIR photometry. We also discuss optical V I photometry from OGLE-III. NIR and optical-NIR Period-Wesenheit (PW) relations are linear over the entire period range (0.0 < log P-FU <= 1.65) and their slopes are, within the intrinsic dispersions, common between the MCs. These are consistent with recent results from pulsation models and observations suggesting that the PW relations are minimally affected by the metal content. The new FU and FO PW relations were calibrated using a sample of Galactic Cepheids with distances based on trigonometric parallaxes and Cepheid pulsation models. By using FU Cepheids we found a true distance moduli of 18.45 +/- 0.02(random) +/- 0.10(systematic) mag (LMC) and 18.93 +/- 0.02(random) +/- 0.10(systematic) mag (SMC). These estimates are the weighted mean over 10 PW relations and the systematic errors account for uncertainties in the zero point and in the reddening law. We found similar distances using FO Cepheids (18.60 +/- 0.03(random) +/- 0.10(systematic) mag (LMC) and 19.12 +/- 0.03(random) +/- 0.10(systematic) mag (SMC)). These new MC distances lead to the relative distance, Delta mu = 0.48 +/- 0.03 mag (FU, log P = 1) and Delta mu = 0.52 +/- 0.03 mag (FO, log P = 0.5), which agrees quite well with previous estimates based on robust distance indicators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据