4.0 Article

Influence of departures from LTE on oxygen abundance determination in the atmospheres of A-K stars

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S1063773713020084

关键词

stellar atmospheres; spectral line formation under nonequilibrium conditions; solar and stellar oxygen abundance

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [IZ73Z0-128180/1]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [IZ73Z0_128180] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have performed non-LTE calculations for O I with a multilevel model atom using currently available atomic data for a set of parameters corresponding to stars of spectral types from A to K. Departures from LTE lead to a strengthening of O I lines, and the difference between the non-LTE and LTE abundances (non-LTE correction) is negative. The non-LTE correction does not exceed 0.05 dex in absolute value for visible O I lines for main-sequence stars in the entire temperature range. For the infrared O I 7771 line, the non-LTE correction can reach -1.9 dex. The departures from LTE are enhanced with increasing temperature and decreasing surface gravity. We have derived the oxygen abundance for three A-type mainsequence stars with reliably determined parameters (Vega, Sirius, HD 32115). For each of the stars, allowance for the departures from LTE leads to a decrease in the difference between the abundances from infrared and visible lines, for example, for Vega from 1.17 dex in LTE to 0.14 dex when abandoning LTE. In the case of Procyon and the Sun, inelastic collisions with HI affect the statistical equilibrium of OI, and agreement between the abundances from different lines is achieved when using Drawin's classical formalism. Based on the O I 6300, 6158, 7771-5, and 8446 lines of the solar spectrum, we have derived the mean oxygen abundance log E > = 8.74 +/- 0.05 using a classical plane-parallel model solar atmosphere and log E > (+3D) = 8.78 +/- 0.03 by applying the 3D corrections taken from the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据