4.6 Article

The high-redshift star formation rate derived from gamma-ray bursts: possible origin and cosmic reionization

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 556, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321623

关键词

gamma rays: general; stars: formation; dark ages, reionization, first stars

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11103007, 11033002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The collapsar model of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) indicates that they may trace the star formation history, so long GRBs may be a useful tool for measuring the high-redshift star formation rate (SFR). The collapsar model explains GRB formation via the collapse of a rapidly rotating massive star with M > 30 M-circle dot into a black hole, which may imply a decrease in SFR at high redshift. However, we find that the Swift GRBs during 2005 to 2012 are biased when tracing the SFR, including a factor about (1 + z)(0.5), which agrees with recent results. After taking this factor, the SFR derived from GRBs does not show a steep drop up to z similar to 9.4. We consider the GRBs produced by rapidly rotating metal-poor stars with low masses to explain the high-redshift GRB rate excess. The chemically homogeneous evolution scenario (CHES) of rapidly rotating stars with mass higher than 12 M-circle dot is recognized as a promising path towards collapsars in connection with long GRBs. Our results indicate that the stars in the mass range 12 M-circle dot < M < 30 M-circle dot for low enough metallicity Z <= 0.004 with the GRB efficiency factor 10(-5) can fit the derived SFR with good accuracy. Combining these two factors, we find that the conversion efficiency from massive stars to GRBs is enhanced by a factor of 10, which may explain the excess of the high-redshift GRB rate. We also investigate the cosmic reionization history using the derived SFR. The GRB-inferred SFR would be sufficient to maintain cosmic reionization over 6 < z < 10 and reproduce the observed optical depth of Thomson scattering to the cosmic microwave background.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据