4.6 Article

Spectral characteristics of the Titanian haze at 1-5 micron from Cassini/VIMS solar occultation data

期刊

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
卷 557, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322173

关键词

planets and satellites: individual: Titan; planets and satellites: atmospheres; planets and satellites: composition; techniques: spectroscopic; radiative transfer; line: identification

资金

  1. World Class University (WCU) program through the National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [R31-10016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We retrieved optical-depth spectra of the Titanian haze in the range 1-5 mu m from solar occultation data obtained by the Cassini/Visual Infrared Mapping Spectrometer (VIMS) at altitudes of 59-502 km. Only limited wavelength intervals within this spectral range have been analyzed before. The haze spectra we retrieved are mostly similar to those of alkane particles (or powders), with three major absorption peaks typical of alkane powders at 2.3, 3.4, and 4.3 mu m. This result suggests that at least in the similar to 60-500 km altitude range, the Titanian haze is mostly composed of alkane particles, possibly with some trace impurities. The absence of the 3.0 and 4.6 mu m features excludes the molecules containing NH and CN bonds that are typical of laboratory-made tholins reported in the literature. The alkane-like spectral characteristics of the haze we observed at similar to 60-500 km differ from previous results obtained at different or overlapping altitudes: a) the presence of aromatic compounds derived from solar-pumped emissions observed at high altitude (600-1250 km) by Cassini/VIMS near 3.3 mu m; and b) the detection of HCN and NH3 in the cores of haze particles collected at low altitude (20-130 km) by the Huygens/Aerosol Collector and Pyrolyser (ACP). We suggest that these different characteristics arise from different structural layers formed by coagulation/coalescence during particle sedimentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据