4.7 Article

Microwave-assisted hydrothermal synthesis of CePO4 nanostructures: Correlation between the structural and optical properties

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 643, 期 -, 页码 S209-S218

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.12.053

关键词

CePO4; Nanostructures; Microwave-assisted hydrothermal method

资金

  1. SIP-IPN
  2. COFAA-IPN
  3. CONACYT - Mexico [CB2009-132660, CB2009-133618]
  4. IPN through the SIP [2014-0164, 2014-0992]
  5. SNI-CONACYT - Mexico

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, the microwave-assisted hydrothermal method is proposed as an alternative to the synthesis of cerium phosphate (CePO4) nanostructures to evaluate the influence of different synthesis parameters on both the structural and optical properties. In order to reach this goal, two different sets of experiments were designed, varying the reaction temperature (130 and 180 degrees CC), synthesis time (15 and 30 min) and sintering temperature (400 and 600 degrees C), maintaining a constant pH = 3. Thereafter, two experimental conditions were selected to assess changes in the properties of CePO4 nanopowders with pH (1, 5, 9 and 11). The crystal structure and morphology of the nanostructures were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Diffuse reflectance properties of CePO4 with different microstructures were studied. The results demonstrated that by using the microwave-assisted hydrothermal method, the shape, size and structural phase of CePO4 can be modulated by using relatively low synthesis temperatures and short reaction times, and depending on pH, a sintering process is not needed to obtain either a desired phase or size. Under the selected experimental conditions, the materials underwent an evolution from nanorods to semispherical nanoparticles, accompanied by a phase transition from hexagonal to monoclinic. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据