4.0 Article

NR2-reactive antibody decreases cell viability through augmentation of Ca2+ influx in systemic lupus erythematosus

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 63, 期 12, 页码 3952-3959

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/art.30616

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22500330] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective AntiN-methyl-D-aspartate (anti-NMDA) receptor subunit NR2-reactive antibody may play a crucial role in neuronal manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, how NR2-reactive antibody acts as a critical modulator of the NMDA receptor is unknown. This study was undertaken to investigate the biologic function of NR2-reactive antibody in patients with SLE. Methods. The study included 14 patients with SLE, 9 of whom had NR2-reactive antibody. We analyzed the effects of NR2-reactive antibody on cell viability and intracellular Ca2+ level. We also investigated the efficacy of zinc as a modulator of the intracellular Ca2+ level in the presence of NR2-reactive antibody. Results. There was a significant inverse correlation between the NR2-reactive antibody titer and cell viability (R-2 = 0.67, P < 0.0001; n = 23), and there was a significant association between the NR2-reactive antibody titer and the intracellular Ca2+ level in NR1/NR2a-transfected HEK 293 cells (R-2 = 0.69, P < 0.0001). Intracellular Ca2+ levels were significantly higher in cells incubated with IgG derived from NR2reactive antibody-positive SLE patients than in those incubated with IgG derived from NR2-reactive antibody-negative SLE patients (P = 0.0002). The addition of zinc decreased the intracellular Ca2+ level in a dose-dependent manner. NR2-reactive antibodypositive SLE IgG weakened the efficacy of zinc as a negative modulator of the intracellular Ca2+ level. Conclusion. Our findings indicate that NR2-reactive antibody decreases cell viability by Ca2+ influx in SLE through inhibition of the binding capacity of zinc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据